Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 7161 - 7180 of 9,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
§§636(b)(1)(A)–(B); United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by WSLL
If exclusion is never permissible, the opinion should state so unequivocally. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:30 pm by Wells Bennett
New York (state legislatures cannot set maximum hours in particular industries); and Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Multimetrixs (PATracer) Whirlpool - ITC issues final determination of no violation in certain refrigerators (337-TA-632) (ITC Law Blog)   US Copyright – Decisions 6th Circuit Court of Appeals on whether confidentiality agreement between the parties protected trade secrets and copyright developed during course of confidential relationship: Multimatic Inc v Faurecia Interior Systems USA (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Trademarks Trademark oppositions cancellations get… [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:16 pm by Francis Pileggi
Before setting forth the test, this opinion discusses the intent necessary for parties to be bound. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Multimetrixs (PATracer) Whirlpool - ITC issues final determination of no violation in certain refrigerators (337-TA-632) (ITC Law Blog)   US Copyright – Decisions 6th Circuit Court of Appeals on whether confidentiality agreement between the parties protected trade secrets and copyright developed during course of confidential relationship: Multimatic Inc v Faurecia Interior Systems USA (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Trademarks Trademark oppositions cancellations get… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
 Claude Monet, Turkeys Unfinished Decoration 1876 Musée D'OrsayThe object, then, is to try to rationalize an order to the quite dynamic states of norm-regulation construction in the many spaces that exist above, beyond or between states. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
 In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]