Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 7161 - 7180 of 16,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
 Likewise, the 1879 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
United States, in which Justice Brandeis concurred, that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market” and in 1974, Justice Powell wrote in Gertz v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 4:43 am by SHG
The case coming before the court, Matter of Linares v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 12:30 am by Mark Summerfield
  In doing so, they have successfully disappointed anybody who was hoping for some interesting developments in the law of obviousness in Australia, and gladdened the hearts of those who value certainty and stability in the law, notwithstanding that there may be opportunities for improvement.There were two issues before the High Court. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
 No, it seems it is you that are confused about "marriage' that churches will perform with marriage on behalf of her employer, not me.Well, I can see that we disagree as to who is confused, but beyond that, you do not explain your position further, so you have given me nothing to which to reply (except as you take up this subject again, later in your response as quoted below).You don't need to remind me of Plessy v Ferguson, and, as you say it was 'upheld' by… [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:54 am by Timothy P. Flynn
And now, perhaps by the Chancellor's design, here comes his 15-minutes of ill-conceived fame.In denying the requested relief upon completion of the proofs, the Chancellor stated that because of the SCOTUS decision in Obergefell v Hodges, the Supreme Court now needed to clarify, "when a marriage is no longer a marriage. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:24 am
The case is Minder Music & Another v Sharples.At the time when this judgment was released the IPKat did not have the chance to report on it. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Based on the quoted language, however, it appears to be the 2001 holding in Ohio v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
Eby (exclusion of undesirable aliens), Buttfield v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am by Cody M. Poplin
Leon informed the plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
  Again, that brief took a position that the agency hoped would be accorded general application. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
 Successful abstracts will propose or outline an argument/position, rather than merely stating a topic. [read post]