Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 7161 - 7180 of 35,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:47 am by Lyle Denniston
  Its attack on a Washington state law that puts a $5,000 limit on contributions to ballot measure committees in the final three weeks before an election could become a significant sequel to the Court’s controversial ruling last January in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm by Dave Maass
Instead, EFF and the ACLU point to a series of recent key decisions—including the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:38 am by Yuanchung Lee
The Circuit today affirmed the defendant’s conviction in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by David Markus
The panel, moderated by Celeste Higgins, includes: Honorable United States Magistrate Lauren Fleischer Louis, J.J. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:44 am by Cody M. Poplin
For the first time since February, proceedings in military commissions case United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
Earlier this week, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the Court) entered what is believed to be one of the highest damages awards ever issued in a patent case, following a 22-day bench trial in Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the nomination of Wendy Vitter to be United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
United States. [1] The entire court will reconsider a July 30, 2013 decision issued by a three-judge panel holding that the government had to prove officers and/or shareholders had aided or abetted fraud, or otherwise took actions that justified piercing the corporate veil, in order to hold them personally liable for US customs law violations committed by a corporate entity. [2] If the full court overrules the three-judge panel, the benefits of incorporation would… [read post]