Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 8,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 10:43 am
For the fisherman and shrimpers who work these waters, their livelihoods lay in limbo. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Schaar v Lehigh Valley Health Servs, Inc, ___F.3d____(3rd Cir. [read post]
2 May 2010, 6:15 pm
No, “Justice” Scalia, I won’t “get over” Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:47 pm
With the recent case of Saffold v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:12 am
Kleffman v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:30 am
Such a scenario is demonstrated by the case of Pickett v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm
Would much rather see subsidy for laying the groundwork and letting others build from that. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:56 pm
: (Class 46) Upsetting the Apple cart: Steve Jobs lays claim to the word ‘Pad’ (IP Whiteboard) RapidShare targets sites over trademark abuse (TorrentFreak) Canada ACTA and copyright reform in Canada (ipblog.ca) Why is CRIA reluctant to provide public specifics about copyright reform? [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:25 pm
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
Lyle Denniston previewed the argument for SCOTUSblog yesterday, and the Christian Science Monitor lays out the background of the case, as well. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Here, if paragraph 9(2)(e) lays down an overriding principle, it contradicts the express provisions of section 14(3) of the HA 1988. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Here, if paragraph 9(2)(e) lays down an overriding principle, it contradicts the express provisions of section 14(3) of the HA 1988. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
My last post laid the foundations for a discussion of Orin Kerr’s latest law review article, “Applying the Fourth Amendment to the Internet: A General Approach” (2010) 62 Stan.L.Rev. 1005. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:15 pm
In Gaito v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
., v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:50 am
The court punts based on the existence of factual disputes, but the court's order is well worth a read just because it lays out the issues and theories. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:10 am
A recent New Jersey appellate court decision (STATE V. [read post]
