Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 7161 - 7180 of 19,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Furthermore, it is crucial to recognize that this last critique by Kohse and Wittes only applies to a case brought under 18 U.S.C. 1512(b) for harassing or intimidating a witness. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Margaret McCaffery
There’s nothing wrong with B and C clients. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:22 am
It draws on his work over the arc of his mandate and its object is to summarize the basic human rights obligations of States on environmental matters, as they have been clarified by human rights bodies. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:38 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
“[T]here has never been a right to absolute privacy,” Rosenstein says, repeating a well-worn line. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm by Emma Kohse, Benjamin Wittes
The report actually doesn’t discuss the plausibility of a case, focusing rather on the likelihood of criminal activity having taken place as a factual matter. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm by Emma Kohse, Benjamin Wittes
The report actually doesn’t discuss the plausibility of a case, focusing rather on the likelihood of criminal activity having taken place as a factual matter. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In an earlier post on his D&O Discourse blog (here), Doug Greene of the Lane Powell firm argued that “as a practical matter, a claim under Item 303 doesn’t add much, if anything, to a plain vanilla claim alleging that a statement was misleading for omitting the same information. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:29 pm by Mark Theodore
 The dissenting Chairman takes a more narrow approach arguing that under the circumstances the question couldn’t [read post]