Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 7161 - 7180 of 13,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Nonetheless, they can be good examples of how tax ignorance adversely affects people apart from matters of national tax policy debate.A Tax Court decision involving an accountant brings this issue back into the spotlight, if only for a moment. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
"[I]f there is no question that a defendant's speech is protected by the First Amendment, the court may dismiss the charge as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:04 pm
” Johnston II, supra, ___ F.3d at p. ___ [2007 WL 1814197,*4].) [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:06 am by SHG
However, in light of the importance of the ghostwriting issue, and the fact that the effect of ghostwriting on disqualification issues is not discussed in the ethics opinions described in the text, we recommend to the Court that it consider the amendment of its rules to resolve the matter. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Dionne contends that “[c]onservatives are willing to bend and break the rules, violate decorum and tradition, hide information and push Judge Kavanaugh through at breakneck speed” because “[t]hey want a Supreme Court that will achieve their policy objectives — on regulation, access to the ballot, social issues, the influence of money in politics and the role of corporations in our national life — no matter what citizens might prefer in the… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 9:29 pm
Farey-Jones, 359 F.3d 1066, 1075 -- 9th Cir. 2003). [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 9:11 am
a post entitled, "smart clients care about bonuses and marketplace 'value.'" My comments to the post were extensive, so I won't reiterate them here, but I hope you'll read them at f/k/a. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
Thus, in Sheridan, supra, 2 Cal.App.3d at page 489, the court stated, “[I]t may not be said as a matter of law, that two or more independent reports of previously untested informers each corroborating the other, of the same criminal activity, do not constitute probable cause for an arrest or search. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Oracle Corp., 404 F.3d 657 (2d Cir. 2005), the Second Circuit held that the existence of the signed agreement was not a matter of the court’s jurisdiction, but rather a merits question. [read post]