Search for: "North v. State" Results 7161 - 7180 of 13,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2015, 10:36 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
” Serving as Solicitor General of the United States; resolving conflicts among departments about and developing the legal position of the United States; contrasting the Solicitor General’s office and the Office of Legal Counsel; engaging the president to decide the legal position of the United States; being a legal advisor in the White House; the value of political service to the independence of legal opinions, why winning Bush v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
FAQS About Affordable Care Act Implementation (Part XXVIII) also states that the Departments also intend to streamline reporting under multiple reporting provisions and reduce unnecessary duplication when they issue the non-QHP issuers and non-grandfathered group health plans. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:10 am by a.burchfield@csuohio.edu
Seven states – Iowa, Utah, Indiana, Montana, Kansas, North Dakota and Idaho – have enacted so-called ag-gag laws which make it a crime to produce undercover videos of animal abuse on factory farms. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm by Amy Howe
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at a recent decision by the Eighth Circuit holding that a North Dakota law which prohibited abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected is unconstitutional, noting that it “closed with a five-page lament: North Dakota’s law may be inconsistent with Roe v Wade and Casey v Planned Parenthood, but the Supreme Court should ‘re-evaluate its jurisprudence. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
This post deals with an opinion recently issued by the Court of Appeals of North Carolina:  State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
Kentucky has learned how to frustrate attempts by injured workers, and their employers, to get back on the job after a work injury.The state's Supreme Court on April 2, in Quad/Graphics v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:06 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
Lord Toulson stated that denying Mr Hunt his costs and ordering him to pay the other party’s costs could be a serious public interest issue. [read post]