Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 7161 - 7176
of 7,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2006, 11:42 am
(ROSS: Long-awaited better standard report availability for BM) 8. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 2:17 pm
_____________________Latvia - Government and Law Websitesin Latvian, English, Russian, German and French languages (as available)Latvian FlagSince the LawPundit speaks fluent Latvian, this post with a list of Latvian government, law and law-related websites is a natural for the LawPundit blog.The Original List from Attorney Aldis Alliks (amended)Attorney (AdvokÄts) Aldis Alliks (advocate@alliks.lv) in Latvia sent me a long list of Latvian government, legal and law-related websites… [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 4:43 am
Duramax Marine, LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 3:54 am
Long story short, where a petitioner wins on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel any information revealed from the prior attorney-client privilege can not be used at retrial.California follows Bittaker v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 8:53 am
John P. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 8:19 pm
426 P.2d 507) [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:53 pm
See also Connell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
(Update, Friday, July 28, 2006: Welcome Instapundit readers - the first link from Instapundit that was bad (my fault) is here, on proportionality and jus ad bellum. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 9:41 am
In doing so the Court noted that under U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Ashcroft, available here, at p. 72 of the PDF file); it means simply that the relevant complex of information is secret. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am
Kissinger, supra, at p. 6 of the PDF file). [read post]
22 Jul 2005, 2:15 pm
June 29, 2005, p. [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
One proof was the dense and above all very coarse-crystalline layer of pure malachite, that ... develops only in the course of very long time periods. [read post]
14 Dec 2004, 5:06 am
Meeks, 88 P.3d 789 (Kan. 2004); People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2004, 1:53 pm
P. 28(j) seeking additional review of his sentencing in light of Blakely v. [read post]