Search for: "People v Word"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 17,915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 6:23 am
From Martinez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 9:37 am
A few days ago, I wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in Nelson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
In Milwarde-Yates v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Several weeks ago, in Driscoll v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm
Monday’s argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
(Alden v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:17 pm
Onyx Acceptance Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am
In Bibliotechnical Athenaeum v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am
This very case helps show why the lesson of Cohen v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
A word mark can hardly be described as decoration or a motif. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
The case was Simpson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:50 am
Illinois Tamale Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:06 am
From Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am
Until December 2010, Fanatics, LLC used the trade mark FOOTBALL FANATICS for its retail services, but then changed to use the word mark FANATICS and the following stylised mark: (“the FANATICS flag mark”). [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 2:22 am
In People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:01 pm
Ceesary v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 3:02 pm
Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in the case of Bostock v. [read post]
