Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 7,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
Kennedy. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:20 pm
If we are to have an effective death penalty, as the Supreme Court has said the Constitution allows (Glossip v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:41 am
”) And so last week the US Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
” (Burwell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
" Campbell, 510 U.S. at 599 (Kennedy, J., concur-ring). [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 7:31 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the Court's liberal wing in that case because of his conclusion, rooted in constitutional history, that states warrant special solicitude when they challenge federal government inaction. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
"International environmental norms reflect not how states regularly behave, but how states speak to each other. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
And it is the case of pedophile Patrick Kennedy, making its way through Louisiana state courts, that could render the issue moot before Texas ever sends a child rapist to death row. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm
Alexis Kennedy. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:36 pm
Billing v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
See California v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
