Search for: "STATE v. SMALL" Results 7161 - 7180 of 16,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am by Jared Beck
 The Report also states that had Clinton sought the required approval, it would have been denied due existing State Department guidelines protecting against security risks. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal created a process R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:05 am by SHG
In a fascinating post, Ken White offers a list of ten small-“l” libertarian questions to ask about laws, given our insatiable demand that government prevent outcomes we dislike while enforcing, at the end of a gun, outcomes we favor. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm by Staff Writer
Supreme Court entered the child pornography with United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 4:24 am by Eric Turkewitz
Mostly, this is the type of information that any hyper-local group of niche practitioners would want to share:  Can you believe that decision yesterday in Rogue v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am by SHG
 USA Today’s Brad Heath twitted a great quote** from United States v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in response to a state law or… [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:06 am by Earl Drott
She allegedly had two small children in her car and had been involved in two other accidents on the same day as the fatal wreck. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:34 am by Broc Romanek
State Law” Practice Area, the US Supreme Court unanimously held – in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. [read post]