Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
But Stevens said that this restriction does not bind state courts, and the justices sent the case back to Minnesota. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
" Here is how it starts:Last week, in Danforth v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
Last week, in Danforth v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 11:51 pm
The case holds that state courts are free, on state habeas, to give retroactive effect to U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:22 pm
” Distinguishing the 1996 case of Medtronic v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:29 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:58 pm
"States are independent sovereigns with plenary authority to make and enforce their own laws as long as they do not infringe on federal constitutional guarantees," Justice Stevens said. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
This symposium essay attempts to remedy that defect, analyzing Pressley in light of the precedent upon which it relied (the Court's 1952 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:05 pm
As Justice Stevens makes clear, what the Court does, in say Crawford, for example, is state that a particular act or omission violates the Constitution. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:56 pm
That concept, most closely identified with the jurisprudence of Justice Antonin Scalia, is a basic rationale behind Wednesday’s 7-2 decision in Danforth v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:41 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority in Danforth v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:36 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority in Danforth v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:30 am
Minnesota, is a 7-2 decision that was authored by Justice Stevens. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:25 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority in Danforth v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:03 am
In LaRue v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:44 pm
Justice Stevens concurred and Justice Ginsburg dissented. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:38 pm
An Empirical (and Normative) Assessment of Scott v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:13 pm
Raich is hard to reconcile with United States v. [read post]
