Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7161 - 7180
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Decision under appeal: added subject-matter, clarity and support by the description2.1 In Reasons 2.1 of the appealed decision, the examining division raised an objection under Article 123(2) EPC against feature (c) of claim 1 (cf. point V above). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:52 pm
On October 10, 2008, the Civil Court of Appeals in Montevideo, Uruguay, affirmed the decision of the 14th Civil Court of Montevideo in Royal & Sun Alliance Seguros Uruguay Sociedad Anónima v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
However, that does not entail preservation of all the elements of which the system consists: cf Secretary for Justice v Lau Kwok Fai & Anor[39]; applied in Catholic Diocese of Hong Kong v Secretary for Justice[40] ; (b) there is no challenge to the constitutionality of NSL 46(1); and (c) in view of: (i) the special status of the NSL as a national law enacted with a specific purpose of safeguarding national security; and… [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:41 pm
In Pew v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 4:33 am
., LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:59 am
P. 23(b)(3). [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
On the video, [Shivers] pointed to the table and stated, `He just threatened me. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 8:35 am
See, e.g., Vannoy v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 1:26 pm
§ 78j(b)) and Rule 10b-5(a), (b), and (c) (17 C.F.R. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:56 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 7:54 am
”); Imhof v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:02 pm
Accordingly, the court reversed the trial court’s order, and the ZBA’s decision was reinstated. 5542 Penn LP v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 2:58 pm
[Emphasis omitted.]The Supreme Court in Place des Arts stated that:Judge Lesage's reasons in City Buick Pontiac, supra, at p. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm
That said, I think the court’s reliance on 301(c) is misplaced; I don’t think that a reading of 512 that safe harbored pre-1972 recordings would limit state law. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 6:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm
Sacramentans for Fair Planning v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
c. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
B. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
(There's no doubt, as a matter of current doctrine, that C raises no problems; the real shame is that even B probably raises no problems for the current Supreme Court majority when it considers the mechanics of plea bargaining.)So, as I understand Mitch's argument, he's asking us to consider the possibility that the Medicaid provision is an example of B (most definitely not A), where the US cannot offer a good faith argument that… [read post]
