Search for: "State v. Core" Results 7161 - 7180 of 7,977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2009, 12:26 pm by Dan Michaluk
From April. #4 United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Jaffe and New York Times v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
That apparently was a reference to the Court's 2004 ruling in Hamdi v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
By contrast, Judge Smith in dissent, while not using that analogy exactly, gets the point across:"The right of confrontation includes -- indeed, is, at its core -- the right to meet one's accuser face to face (Coy v Iowa, 487 US 1012, 1016 [1988]). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:31 am by George M. Wallace
The Court's decision, in the case of Curious Theater Company v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:55 pm
Today, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a groundbreaking decision in the case State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:28 pm
At its core, this case is nothing more and nothing less about the state using its nondiscrimination policy (a policy that was in part designed to protect religious expression) to exclude an organization it does not like. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:09 pm by Hull & Hull LLP
  One of the reasons why it was distinguishable was because this case, Newport v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:29 pm by Richard Hornsby
As for who has the better legal argument, I would point out that the State cited State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by James Hamilton
The company's importance as a source of credit for households, businesses, and state and local governments must also be considered, as well as its source of liquidity for the financial system. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am by Alex Manevich
The core of the dispute over immunity in Kazemi (Estate of) v. [read post]