Search for: "State v. E. F."
Results 7161 - 7180
of 8,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Similarly, if data have to erased in compliance with a legal obligation (GDPR, art. 17(1)(e)) then ongoing processing will also clearly be unlawful. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
GENERAL REAL ESTATE Constellation-F, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm
Chepiga 212-373-3421gchepiga@paulweiss.com Charles E. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:01 pm
Williams v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:11 pm
As stated above, the Eighth Circuit noted in the Cairns decision that the Supreme Court reached a similar outcome in Burrage v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
The code relevant code states: (from DC Code 16-803)(2) (A) If a period of at least 5 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant's sentence for a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction in the District of Columbia or for a conviction in any jurisdiction for an offense that involved conduct that would constitute a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction if committed in the District, the conviction shall not disqualify the movant from filing a motion to seal an arrest and related… [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
IDEA § 615(f)(3)(E). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
By the time of Nebbia v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:29 am
" (quoting Institut Nat’l Des Appellations d’Origine v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 6:10 pm
But if an Ontario case, Leibel v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 5:01 am
Curious, I dug up the appellate opinion, U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
McCoy 151,600 150,000 0 10,102 311,702 Beth E. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
Howard Univ., 153 F.3d 731, 736 (D.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:19 pm
Double E Holdings Corp., 2015 WL 7461807 (Del. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
(f) Petitioner. -- "Petitioner" means an individual who files a petition under § 3-1503 of this subtitle. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:32 am
Court, 407 U.S. at 313; United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm
Commentary magazine has published the responses they received from a wide variety of writers and broadcasters to the question ‘is free speech under threat in the United States? [read post]
