Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 19,649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Morgan Canada has not demonstrated a strong likelihood that it will establish at trial that Mr. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Morgan Canada has not demonstrated a strong likelihood that it will establish at trial that Mr. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:18 pm
In Jaimez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 1:40 am
Under Teague v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Political Backing v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
People v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Legislative enactments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality and parties challenging a duly enacted statute face the initial burden of demonstrating the statute's invalidity beyond a reasonable doubt" (Delgado v State of New York, 194 AD3d 98, 103 [3d Dept 2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], affd 39 NY3d 242 [2022]; see Center for Jud. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:47 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 11:37 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Rodney Strong v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Since Begum, there has been Tsfayo v United Kingdom 48 EHRR 18. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 7:27 am
In Swett v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
Schwab v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:14 pm
(Lee v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am
We’re certainly not suggesting that if the argument were based on a more financially robust relationship it would have prevailed (see Trimble) – here the doctor’s testimony was simply too strong. [read post]
