Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 7161 - 7180 of 8,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2022, 6:55 am by Kyle Hulehan
Background Under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the President may impose tariffs if “an article is being imported in the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten or impair the national security. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am by Lyle Denniston
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 After losing before the New Jersey Supreme Court, Princeton appealed to the United States Supreme Court with an absurd argument that their institutional First Amendment rights were violated by requiring that it allow people like my client on campus. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm by John Elwood
Jurisdictional Statement   Motion of Federal Election Commission to dismiss or affirm Opposition to motion to dismiss or affirm Amicus brief of Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights et al. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am by Betsy McKenzie
HOWARD SAFIR, Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, et al., 99 F. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm by Tom Lamb
Mensing case was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on June 23, 2011. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:58 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
(c) Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, except that no person may rely upon any conduct that would have been actionable as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities to establish a violation of section 1962. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:40 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Committee for Cultural Policy (CCP) called the regulations “inappropriate due to the lack of hard evidence for money-laundering activities by antiquities businesses in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Schmitt, et al., eds., 13 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law (2010), pp. 133-173. [read post]