Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 7161 - 7180 of 21,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
FELDMAN, District Judge.Before the Court is the plaintiff's motion to reconsider the Court's Order and Reasons dated August 9, 2017, in which the Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
FELDMAN, District Judge.Before the Court is the plaintiff's motion to reconsider the Court's Order and Reasons dated August 9, 2017, in which the Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 9:34 am by Nassiri Law
Several months later, that subordinate was removed from plaintiff’s job sites and was transferred to work at testing sites that required him to travel 3 to 4 hours daily. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 10:30 am by Jarod Bona
  For now, however, just keep in mind that as a plaintiff, you could also file an antitrust complaint in the EU before a national court. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 1:25 pm by Dean I. Weitzman, Esq.
“Hatfield, who is currently in prison after being convicted on charges stemming from the accident, had a history of DUI, fleeing from police and was once fired from a previous job for failing a drug test,” according to plaintiff’s memos in the case. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:41 am by Carl Neff
Under the Rales test, where a putative derivative plaintiff alleges demand futility, in order to avoid dismissal, the shareholder must point to particularized allegations in its complaint raising reasonable doubt that a majority of the board could impartially consider a demand to sue. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:35 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The only real way the cancer is caught early is when doctors are performing other medical tests or even surgery and they happen to see the mesothelioma tumors. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 11:52 am by Eric Beasley
In this Tennessee premises liability case, R.B. was in the process of getting routine drug testing for his work when he tripped and fell on a door frame leading into the testing facility. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Petrobras argued that the district court gave undue weight to the plaintiffs' empirical test, which measured the magnitude of responsive price changes in Petrobras securities without considering the direction of those changes. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:58 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  This was unheard of because as many plaintiffs have discovered, a metal on metal artificial hip is not a good design. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
” The court agreed with the plaintiffs, holding that the plaintiffs’ compensation did not meet the highly compensated employee exemption’s salary basis test. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:02 am by amul
Laws shouldn’t impede security testing and make it harder to discover and report vulnerabilities. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:42 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
A lawsuit filed after a drunk driving accident in Boston is a civil action where defendant may be held liable and the plaintiff awarded monetary damages. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:32 am by John Hochfelder
Nonetheless, the court ordered a reduction of the punitive damages awards from $24,000,000 for each plaintiff to $8,000,000 for plaintiff Leo and $9,500,000 for plaintiff Kurtaj. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm by Francis Pileggi
  Plaintiffs consented to a postponement of the depositions of the five individual defendants, but otherwise objected to the motion for stay. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
" This means that the plaintiff "knew" the dog had a propensity to bite either because of the dog's known viciousness or because of the plaintiff's deliberate acts intended to incite the animal. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
" This means that the plaintiff "knew" the dog had a propensity to bite either because of the dog's known viciousness or because of the plaintiff's deliberate acts intended to incite the animal. [read post]