Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 7161 - 7180 of 7,231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2007, 11:46 am
If a trademark is being used to identify the source of a company's goods/services, then it can be registered with the the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 3:04 pm
" All content is in both English and Chinese and the site is for both Western companies involved with China and Chinese companies seeking information and contacts in the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 9:30 am
According to an article in Antara news, the United States Patent & Trademark Office has rejected key claims in the Hexagon '148 patent. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 6:04 pm
  However, with only very limited exceptions, trademarks and patents must be registered in China for there to be any protection. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 5:22 pm
IP practitioners love to carp about the free patent search site offered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 2:25 pm
You can search over 7 million patents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office—from those issued in the 1790s up to mid-2006. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 12:37 pm
"Google was live [12/14/2006] with a service enabling Internet users to search through the more than seven million patents granted in the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 9:03 pm
If a trademark is being used to identify the source of a company’s goods/services, then it can be registered with the the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 6:58 am
This opinion is based upon our search of the relevant records of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 2:17 pm
Via an email: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will host an online product launch and free training for the release of Private PAIR 7.0, the feature that allows patent filers to access materials and view the status of their applications, on December 19th at 1:00 p.m. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 6:55 am
If a company name is being used to identify the source of a company’s goods/services, then it can be registered with the the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 6:41 am
If a logo is being used to identify the source of a company’s goods/services, then it can be registered with the the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:34 am
Section 187 exempts officers and agents of the United States from these prohibitions. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 9:28 am
The application still has to be vetted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office before a patent will issue, but its a good sign of the direction that Sony is headed.Link to USPTO copy of application. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:49 am
New USPTO Video Now Available for Viewing"Promoting Innovation:  Today's USPTO"Come visit the United States Patent and Trademark Office without leaving your home. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 12:33 am
The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), provider of pro-bono legal services to protect and advance Free and Open Source Software, has filed a formal request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for re-examination of Blackboard's e-Learning patent.... [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 6:22 pm
If a slogan or tagline is being used to identify the source of a company’s goods/services, then it can be registered with the the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 2:57 pm
Many more examples can be found in the United States Patent and Trademark Office Fee Schedule where the only limits are your imagination and the $1000. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:47 am
As of February 1, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will no longer be offering the $10 document disclosure program. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 2:41 pm
") The other group learned the invention's history first, and was less likely to see the invention as obvious.(...)KSR's lawyer James Dabney, a partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, says that the change doesn't weaken his client's position at all: "The solicitor general of the United States and the Patent and Trademark Office have filed a brief that strongly disagrees with Mr. [read post]