Search for: "United States v. District Court"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 34,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2006, 7:52 am
The doctrine, originating in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:48 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:06 pm
United States, 505 U. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
On June 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court announced a rule that blurs the lines between antitrust and patent law in the context of Hatch-Waxman litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 10:08 am
The individual filed a class action lawsuit against Shopify in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging violations of various California state privacy and unfair competition laws. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm
These arguments were dismissed by the district court, but our collective assessment strongly suggests their validity. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:47 pm
– United States District Court – District of New Jersey – June 21st, 2017) involves charges at toll booths. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:54 pm
In [United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 1:54 pm
The issue before the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth District, (the “Court”) on appeal was whether a mineral lease came into effect under Louisiana law such that the Plaintiffs have standing to pursue constitutional takings claims against a local government. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:47 pm
The issue before the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth District, (the “Court”) on appeal was whether a mineral lease came into effect under Louisiana law such that the Plaintiffs have standing to pursue constitutional takings claims against a local government. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 2:59 pm
The issue before the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth District, (the “Court”) on appeal was whether a mineral lease came into effect under Louisiana law such that the Plaintiffs have standing to pursue constitutional takings claims against a local government. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:42 pm
In practice, these claims rarely succeed, like a week ago in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania law recognizes an independent cause of action for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing only in "very limited circumstances," such as insureds' dealings with insurers and franchisees' dealings with franchisees. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm
"In rejecting Smallwood’s Fourth Amendment challenge, the district court relied upon United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:55 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
This class action lawsuit, filed by three Wells Fargo customers in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, called for at least $5 million in damages, as well as potential punitive damages, stemming from the bank’s opening of at least 2 million accounts that its customers did not authorize. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
This class action lawsuit, filed by three Wells Fargo customers in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, called for at least $5 million in damages, as well as potential punitive damages, stemming from the bank’s opening of at least 2 million accounts that its customers did not authorize. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
The Court itself even noted that it is the law of the United States that the First Amendment does protect a significant amount of criticism and challenge directed at police officers. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
The Court itself even noted that it is the law of the United States that the First Amendment does protect a significant amount of criticism and challenge directed at police officers. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:00 am
Here is how the opinion starts: This appeal concerns the question whether, after United States v. [read post]
