Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 7161 - 7180 of 8,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by Brett Trout
Quon Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in City of Ontario v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:57 am by Kent Scheidegger
As noted in Bill's post, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm by Erin Miller
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”) eliminated the writ of habeas corpus for any “alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:19 am by Howard Knopf
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari (i.e. it will hear the appeal) in the case of 08-1423 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION V. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:04 pm
Mulgrew:This letter will confirm the mutual understandings and agreements between the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York ("DOE") and the United Federation of Teachers ("UFT"). [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:04 am by LRToday
  On March 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am by Bexis
  The Court accepted that, in any kind of suit, §337(a) restricts the ability of a plaintiff to pursue a theory that turns on claimed FDCA violations:Section 337(a) of the FDCA bars private enforcement of the statute, stating that “all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this [Act] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:09 am by Carolyn Moskowitz
Supreme Court heard arguments on whether U.S. courts have jurisdiction over cases involving international investors purchasing securities traded on exchanges outside the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:46 pm by suffolkmcls
Mass. and prohibiting webcasting) (.pdf) Public Notice Regarding the Local Rules of the United States District Court for [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm by AALRR
This has resulted in a backlog of unresolved cases pending before the NLRB and in a case pending before the United States Supreme Court calling for the Supreme Court to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act permits the NLRB to act when there are only two sitting members of the NLRB, New Process Steel v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am by INFORRM
The following reserved High Court judgment in a media case remains outstanding: Dee v Telegraph Media Group Ltd, heard 24-25 February 2010 [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:24 pm by Ashby Jones
“Toyota maintains its United States corporate headquarters within this district, and relevant documents and witnesses are likely located there. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:45 am by Lisa McElroy
  However, in Dillon, the Court must look to its own decision in one of the major decisions of the decade, United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:15 pm by John Steele
Two cases heard by the United States Supreme Court during the 2009-10 term raised this very issue. [read post]