Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
Today the General Court held otherwise after a successful appeal by Tilda from the Board of Appeal decision: Tilda Riceland Private Ltd v OHIM (T304/09). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Each of them had been viewed thousands or tens of thousands of times by individuals throughout the world, including the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:48 am
In a 1983 decision United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:12 am
On the contrary, the process involves substantive examination wherein a United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) Examining Attorney carefully considers the mark in the application to insure that it is in accordance with the USPTO’s specific examination procedures and specific parameters of trademark law, which include close review of the description of the mark, as well as an opportunity for any interested third party to oppose the… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:28 am
First person to be murdered by law in the United States since 1967. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm
Quotations from our interviews and survey responses reflect the views and personal experiences of individuals, not necessarily the experience of most ISOs across the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
For United States Dept. of Justice, Interested Party: Susan Frances Knight, U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm
” The complaint states that the Defendants are selling infringing merchandise under numerous Landry marks on Nationalcap.net and elsewhere. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Mark Warby QC for the applicants described the ruling as “incomplete and an incompletely reasoned balancing exercise which ignores reputational concerns and gives the superficial appearance of fairness” The Administrative Court reserved judgment on the application. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
And when people take up arms against the United States and [are] captured within the United States, why should we not be able to use our military and intelligence community to question that person as to what they know about enemy activity? [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
In SEC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
In SEC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Much like the fact that almost 150 years after the ratification of the 13th Amendment the United States still struggles to annihilate human trafficking and slavery within its borders, most Americans are unaware of the history of eugenics and forced sterilization in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm
Much like the fact that almost 150 years after the ratification of the 13th Amendment the United States still struggles to annihilate human trafficking and slavery within its borders, most Americans are unaware of the history of eugenics and forced sterilization in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:21 am
Medik Ostomy, a lawful business which parallel imported genuine Hollister ostomy products from elsewhere in the EU and sold them in the United Kingdom, slipped up by failing to comply with the requirement for a parallel importer to give prior notice to the trade mark owner that he was going to sell repackaged or relabelled goods bearing the HOLLISTER and DANSAC marks. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:59 am
United States v. [read post]
