Search for: "Warne v. State"
Results 7161 - 7180
of 14,218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2014, 2:14 pm
Employees suing to recover prevailing wages under the West Virginia Prevailing Wage Act (PWA) may not also recover liquidated damages under the West Virginia Wage Payment and Collection Act (WPCA), the West Virginia Supreme Court ruled in Grim v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
Principle 7, however, goes onto warn that online undercover facilities “can raise [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
So what follows is our best interpretation of the position of the fifty states (plus DC and Puerto Rico) on whether any presumption arises when a plaintiff claims an inadequate warning (almost every case) that a hypothetical warning (never in fact given) would have been heeded.One thing we have discovered of particular note (at least to us), is that the heeding presumption is an area where the federal courts have run amok, ignoring their obligations under the Erie… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
LaRocca’s suit for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
In the Secretary of State’s view, qualification criteria form part of an allocation scheme. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am
She was warned “about giving the public the impression that [PCAS] was moving toward a no-kill shelter. . . . [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Tyree v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:36 am
From United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in Harper & Roe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm
Referring to last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm
Hytner’s report states that, of those 121 cases, 18 have resulted in no further action being taken; 27 resulted in warnings; 16 resulted in the participant being reminded of their responsibilities and 60 led to charges. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Warning: it's pretty long! [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:09 am
Noting that the Supreme Court, in Barnett v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Avalos v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
And in Johnson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:52 pm
(United State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:16 pm
In Design Home Remodeling Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:16 pm
Eghnayem v. [read post]
