Search for: "White v. United States" Results 7161 - 7180 of 7,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 1:41 pm
White, 54 M.J. 469 (C.A.A.F. 2001). [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:26 am
This facility of our brain was exploited in Neo-Impressionism, a school of art founded by Georges Seurat, whose computer-futuristic and greatly underestimated Pointillism (try it out here) consisted of painting by small dots too small to be seen individually, which gave his paintings a tremendous brilliance because of the miniscule white space surrounding those dots. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
Calling the motion "wholly without merit, both factually and legally," the judge, Denny Chin of United States District Court threw out the case. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:13 pm
Gonzales is an attempt  to reverse the change of copyright protection in the United States from an opt-in system to an opt-out system brought by the Copyright Renewal Act (CRA) of 1992 and the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA). [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:09 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 10:01 pm
However, they have been quite successful in making it very difficult for poor women and women in rural areas to obtain abortions, and they have been able to effectively drive abortion providers out of a number of areas of the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 6:54 pm by The Owens Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
” CCA overturned Bauder and stated the proper rule under the Texas Constitution is the rule articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Oregon v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 10:40 pm
Here is the abstract:In 2002, the United States Supreme Court held that a provision of Minnesota's rules regulating the conduct of judicial elections violated the free speech guarantees contained in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:38 am
Call it Greenhouse v. [read post]