Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 6:08 am
It is well-settled that “[s]uccessive motions for summary judgment should not be entertained without a showing of newly discovered evidence or other sufficient justification. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 3:52 pm
Today's decision of the Alabama Supreme Court in Young Americans for Liberty v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
S. 516, 530 (1945); see also Wayte v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
Stephen S., supra at 947; Matter of Canazon v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:02 am
Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In Blue v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:17 am
Stiviano is a gold digger — she’s alleging V. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
Nonetheless, Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 32411(U) November 16, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 160298/2016 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich is a good example of how the court treats a “hindsight” case. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:41 pm
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]1 Cite as: 552 U. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
As stated by the U. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:57 am
in Gurvitz v Wank; 2011 NY Slip Op 32511(U); September 19, 2011; Supreme Court, Nassau County; Docket Number: 10468/06; Judge: Ute W. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
But what is striking about the Supreme Court’s pending decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:53 am
Tax Court in Altera v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am
United States, 15-5238, and, well, also passed on a few other times. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
Supreme Court, presenting the question of whether: “[u]nder 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
This post explores the Third Circuit’s decision, Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
Demand for premium pay where union cannot negotiate a disciplinary procedure a mandatory subject of collective bargainingMatter of City of New York v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 2008 NY Slip Op 52693(U), Decided on January 18, 2008, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Henry F. [read post]
