Search for: "*long v. Murphy"
Results 701 - 720
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2008, 4:08 pm
Murphy, 164 Cal. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
That, combined with an intervening Supreme Court decision (Murphy Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:38 am
(Murphy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 1:32 am
The court also noted that it is not required to follow the DLSE opinion on the matter, citing Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:14 pm
But despite recognizing that "mandatory rest and meal breaks have 'have long been viewed as part of the remedial worker protection framework' designed to protect workers' health and safety (Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:39 am
The DLSE was forced to beat a hasty retreat, however, when the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
As it turns out, when I wrote those words there already was percolating in Nassau County Supreme Court a buy-out proceeding in a shareholder oppression case, Murphy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:38 am
Kansas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 6:12 pm
See In re Wada and Murphy, citing CFMT, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 4:43 pm
Read the whole case, D'Agostino v. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:02 am
Murphy, Constitutional Democracy (2006)Keith E. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
Long Island Railroad Co. , 248 N.Y. 339 (N.Y. 1928) The Peevyhouses from Peevyhouse v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:46 am
AbbottThe case of Brewer v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
And Tazewell County began a pretrial diversion program through its state's attorney's office in 1974, long before the term "therapeutic jurisprudence" was coined.Today, according to State's Attorney Stewart Umholtz's web-site, Tazewell's deferred prosecution program "continues to supervise non-violent adult misdemeanor and felony first offenders that are screened by the Taze-well County State's Attorney's Office. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Murphy (NFP) - "In sum, the trial court erred in suppressing the evidence seized from the garage and residence at 1110 East Copperline Road. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 9:39 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 8:19 am
Citing San Diego v. [read post]
