Search for: "*u.s. v. March"
Results 701 - 720
of 12,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
First of all, "Kenneth Studhorse" sounds like the made-up name of a porn star, not the actual name of a defendant.But, apparently, it's not made up at all. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:35 pm
It seems to me like Judge Beezer's got a point.Guy Seaton was convicted of six counts of Medicare fraud way back in 2002. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Judge Smith -- welcome to the Ninth Circuit, by the way -- writes a very nice opinion in this case. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:43 pm
You say you want to buy two ounces of methamphetamine. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 3:48 pm
It's sometimes hard to explain to students -- or even, on occasion, lawyers -- what precedential difference (if any) it makes that a Supreme Court opinion is a 5-4 rather than a 9-0. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:00 pm
It has taken me half the day to read the entirety of this 117-page (single spaced!) [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
Future historians wondering how we possibly could have gotten ourselves into the 2008 recession, sparked by the housing bubble, need look no further than the facts of this case.Because here's what you were able to do back in the day:"In 2007, Peter Morris applied for three loans from three financial institutions (Washington Mutual, Lehman Brothers, and Bank of America) to purchase three properties, all located at “Sonic Court” in Riverside, California. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:39 am
When you have Judges Pregerson and Dorothy Nelson on the panel, you sometimes get an opinion that's much nicer to -- e.g., softer on -- the participants than you might receive from some other judges. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 10:37 am
Here's a good case for the statutory interpretation crowd. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:09 am
Judge Trott begins this opinion with a snippet from a poem by Sir Walter Scott: "Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:53 am
No one really said that race doesn't matter anymore in the 21st century. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:04 am
No. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
Judge Smith begins his opinion by saying: "Defendants-Appellants Sigmund Eriksen and Raymond Eriksen appeal their convictions stemming from their misappropriation of employee 401(k) contributions to pay their company’s operating expenses. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
Let me try my hand at writing a concurrence to this one:Martin, J., concurring:I can't fault my colleagues for their holding. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:07 pm
You'd think that this was a law school exam hypothetical if you didn't read it in the Federal Reporter. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
If you sign on with the screen name "horneyguy59405" -- 59405 being a zip code in Great Falls, Montana, where you live -- and all of the sudden a "15-year old girl" starts chatting you up, do I really have to tell you: (1) it's not a 15-year old girl, and (2) is (a) a guy, and/or (b) the police? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
I'm intrigued. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:59 pm
Okay, I get it now. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:02 am
If you like kiddie porn (and print it out from the internet), put it away before you hire a contractor to redo your cabinets. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:30 pm
Why is the Southern District of California -- i.e., San Diego -- so overwhelmed with federal criminal cases, you might ask? [read post]
