Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 701 - 720
of 11,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2014, 3:16 pm
Thompson A recent decision by the First Circuit Court of Appeals examined the question of whether expense reimbursements were actually "shadow wages" that should have been included when calculating an employee’s overtime rate. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
Or if you decide that the Examiner's construction is not so unreasonable, you can decide not to appeal. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:12 am
Continue reading → [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:12 am
Continue reading → [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 9:08 am
We look forward to reading the ruling of the Board of Appeal in its entirity. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:28 pm
" The Applicant appealed the rejection. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
This decision deals with an appeal against the refusal of an application by the Examining Division. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
Examining the motion to reopen voir dire, the court explained that N.C.G.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 11:18 am
The reasoning may still include the established Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit standard that a claimed invention may be obvious if the examiner identifies a prior art teaching, suggestion, or motivation (TSM) to make it. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
Key principles and takeaways from the published portion of the Court of Appeal’s opinion include: The statutory right to appeal in civil cases generally allows an appeal to be taken “[f]rom a judgment, except an interlocutory judgment’ and also from an order made after an appealable judgment. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 7:27 am
— BoA Communication: Decision in case T 1063/18 on the patentability of plants 7 December 2018 Case T 1063/18 concerns the appeal by the applicant against the decision of the examining division to refuse European patent application no. 12 756 468.0 (publication no. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 9:24 am
Continue reading [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:30 am
On appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the PTAB affirmed the examiner’s conclusion that all of Stepan Co. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:30 am
On appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the PTAB affirmed the examiner’s conclusion that all of Stepan Co. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 2:51 pm
The Board reversed the rejection: The Examiner erroneously read both the upper flange/upper support width and the outer face on the same structure in Mulholland. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:03 pm
We'll examine that shortly. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 12:46 am
This debate has recently been revisited by a judgment handed down on 14 May 2018 by the Barcelona Court of Appeal (Section 15) which, among other aspects, examined how damages should be determined in a patent case. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm
Using empirical techniques and an original dataset that is substantially more comprehensive than those used in previous studies, it examines citation to legal scholarship by the United States circuit courts of appeals over the last 59 years. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
The entire relevant text reads as follows (71 Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:39 am
The opinion is from the First Court of Appeals and is styled, J.R. [read post]
