Search for: "AIPLA"
Results 701 - 720
of 738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2007, 11:42 am
A big job fair: Applicants should also consider the AIPLA Job Fair — resumes are due by August 31. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 7:37 am
In addition, certain amendments clarify rules, conform the rules to current practice, and correct typographical errors or deviations from standard terminology.If the rules as implemented are the same as those proposed, parties to TTAB proceedings will notice several major differences, including:An initial disclosure requirementReduction in the number of interrogatories from 75 to 25The standard TTAB protective order entered in every case by defaultSpecific timing for disclosure of expert witnesses… [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:23 pm
AIPLA’s amicus brief supports Bilski and a broad interpretation of patentable subject matter. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:07 am
It appears that neither the IPO or AIPLA are actively opposing the rule changes. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:24 am
" Under the AIPLA's proposal, why bother to have a verification at all? [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 9:18 pm
The IPO has PowerPoint slides on the patent quality issue from an FICPI/AIPLA colloquium held in Amsterdam on June 8, 9 2007, which colloquium overlapped with "Spring Seminar 2007" of the LAIPLA and SDIPLA, which meeting also discussed patent quality.The second slide of the Amsterdam talk was titled "quality patent prosecution," as were slides 3-5. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 8:26 pm
The letter also highlights the recent damages analysis by former AIPLA president BIll Rooklidge while taking a dig at the credibility of law professors who have been pushing for reform -- "Lawyers employed by particular companies, like most law professors, have little or no experience [in patent litigation]. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:23 pm
AIPLA will repeat the seminar on June 14 in Minneapolis and June 21 in Portland. [read post]
31 May 2007, 10:03 am
Zura also notes that the median verdict was $4.2M, which is almost the median cost litigants pay to take a $25M+ patent case to trial ($4.5M according to the 2005 AIPLA survey). [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:05 am
Hal writes: One of the two most divisive points ripping apart patent reform legislation is the ever more contentious debate over apportionment of damages, as witnessed by the differing views of former AIPLA President William Rooklidge in contrast to Georgetown University Law Professor John R. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:26 am
Separately, the word at AIPLA wasThe "2+1" Limit on Continuations/RCE's: "2+1" First, a patent applicant is limited to one (1) RCE and (2) continuing applications; The rules will be applied retroactively for cases that have not yet received a first action on the merits. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:00 am
With the AIPLA 2007 spring meeting going on in Boston this week, there has been no shortage of rumors flying about the substance of the new continuation rules expected to be issued by the USPTO in July. [read post]
10 May 2007, 11:58 am
Hal Wegner reports from the Boston AIPLA meeting details of the pending USPTO continuation rules: limits to the number of continuations and RCEs. [read post]
10 May 2007, 11:43 am
Rumors via Hal Wegner: The continuation rules continue to be the corridor talk of the Boston AIPLA meeting which continues through tomorrow. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:45 am
AIPLA opposes amendment arguing that it "would only benefit foreign manufacturers accused of unfair trade practices. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
By Hal WegnerBefore an overflow hearing room on an internationally available web broadcast, Chairman Howard Berman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee relevant to patents hosted a most informative and candid hearing yesterday afternoon joined by roughly ten of his committee colleagues, including Rep. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:26 pm
Miller, Patented Compounds Inherently Coproduced as Trace Impurities: Issues of Inherent Anticipation and Literal Infringement, 32 AIPLA Q.J. 425, 442 (2004) (identifying a nine-part test attributable to another author)Footnote 42 recites: See, e.g., Miller, supra note 7, at 452-53; Alloway, supra note 7, at 86-87.Footnote 55 directs us to 339 F.3d at 1380, and DOES NOT include any quoted text.Of Elan, footnote 8 observes: Elan Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:16 pm
Yours truly, a/k/a the TTABlogger, will be speaking to a Joint Session of the AIPLA Trademark Committees at the AIPLA Spring Meeting in Boston on Wednesday, May 9, 3:40 to 4:40 PM. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:55 pm
Cir. 1991) (to anticipate, every element of the claims must appear in a single prior art reference, or if not expressly shown, then demonstrated to be known to persons experienced in the field of technology) These days, it is enough that the thing be known AT THE TIME OF LITIGATION, with of course a proof, at the time of litigation, that the thing was present at the time of the prior art (although not necessarily "known" at the time of the prior art.)IPBiz has discussed this issue many… [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
The dreaded ESD requirements for Petitions to Make Special after August 26, 2006 will include: (a) certification of a preexamination search having been performed (with some very particular detailed requirements on NPL and international documents as well as disclosure of search term strategies and patent classes); (b) an identification of the most relevant art (but no saving grace under Rule 56 for what happens if you "guess" wrong in the eyes of a future litigant about which… [read post]
