Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins"
Results 701 - 720
of 901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2009, 10:43 am
More on the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Several years ago, I published a list of state-specific Family Law blogs. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
More on the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:17 am
Number 4 is the Seventh Circuit's decision in AutoZone v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:17 am
Pursuant to Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:17 am
Pursuant to Atkins v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
(Senate Bill 628)The Supreme Court ruling came in Atkins v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
Supreme Court has already ruled the death penalty unconstitutional in cases involving defendants with mental retardation (Atkins v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:24 am
Supreme Court has already ruled the death penalty unconstitutional in cases involving defendants with mental retardation (Atkins v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
Atkins, 42 AD2d 799, 840 NYS2d 217 (3d Dept 2007). [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 1:39 am
BiesCRIMINAL PRACTICE- Double Jeopardy - Insanity - Sentencing"The Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar a state court from conducting a full hearing on mental capacity under Atkins v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:43 pm
It's unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation, the Court said in Atkins v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
At issue in the case was whether double jeopardy barred Ohio from holding a hearing to determine the mental competency of an inmate sentenced to death before Atkins v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
To succeed on their motion for summary judgment, the defendants were required to establish, through the submission of evidentiary proof in admissible form, that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of the cause of action (see Suydam v O'Neill, 276 AD2d 549; Ostriker v Taylor, Atkins & Ostrow, 258 AD2d 572). [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:56 am
Both also agreed that the death specifications outweighed mitigation beyon a reasonable doubt and therefore affirmed his death sentence.In 2002, the United States Supreme Court decided Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:17 pm
A State court’s determination that a defendant’s mental retardation was a mitigating factor in the penalty phase of a capital case does not trigger Double Jeopardy issue preclusion, and foreclose the question whether, in the wake of the subsequently-decided decision in Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:47 pm
Six years later, of course, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:16 am
We don't execute the mentally retarded in this country; this has been held to violate the Eighth Amendment as being cruel and unusual punishment in Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:26 am
In Bobby v. [read post]
