Search for: "BANKS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 701 - 720 of 3,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 10:21 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  Accordingly, AT&T moved for arbitration in accordance with the contract, but the district court denied AT&T’s motion, relying on Discover Bank v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 7:43 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Circuit, in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm by Jon Sands
California, in which the California determinate sentencing scheme was found to violate the rule of Apprendi v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
On May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeals held in the Luther v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:46 pm
Pacific Mercantile Bank, 07 C.D.O.S. 979 (Jan. 25, 2001).In this case, the court noted no California state court had addressed the question of "whether a right to rescind under TILA applies on a class-wide basis, and the issue remains a matter of sharp debate among other courts. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Jeramie J. Fortenberry, LL.M.
The recent Kentucky Supreme Court decision in JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Aug. 10, 2005), for example, the court held (in contrast to Berry and Ball) that "California courts generally find financial transactions subject to the CLRA," and concluded that "because other types of financial transactions involving banking services appear to be covered by the CLRA, the Court finds that the CLRA covers the mortgages at issue. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Jon Ibanez
The California Supreme Court held in Ingersoll v. [read post]