Search for: "Baker v. Baker"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
Clark v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:34 pm
Baker, 2009 WL 1741756 (Pa. 2009). [read post]
Helping Neighbor with Livestock Not Included in Iowa’s Domesticated Animal Activity Liability Shield
6 Jul 2023, 3:19 pm
The district court agreed, dismissing the case after finding that plaintiff’s damages were similar to those arising in Baker v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 7:38 am
Facts: This case (Burroughs Diesel, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
See Baker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm
Department of Justice (Sept. 7) have both weighed in with amicus briefs in the Supreme Court’s fall-term case of Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:21 am
In this week’s case (Amezcua v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
Baker & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government& Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 141. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:35 am
(The Court relied heavily on the Commission's work in Crawford v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:29 am
” At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg considers the free-exercise arguments put forward by the petitioners in the case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:11 am
At the Florida Court Review, John Cavaliere looks at Lozman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:31 pm
Baker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Baker v Village of Elmsford has unanimously held that the Village of Elmsford may not demap and discontinue portions of Vreeland Avenue and River Street unless the Village Board determines the streets are useless and it takes a hard look at the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Baker v Village of Elmsford has unanimously held that the Village of Elmsford may not demap and discontinue portions of Vreeland Avenue and River Street unless the Village Board determines the streets are useless and it takes a hard look at the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
In contrast to CAAF's opinion in Forney, United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:45 pm
Here is the principal issue that came to my mind upon reading Judge Baker's majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
