Search for: "Barrett v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 2,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm by Ilya Somin
  As noted in my last post about today's Supreme Court ruling in in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Anyone who believes that the Madison of 1787-88 was a devotee of "states rights" is truly illiterate. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm by Mark Latham
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm by Josh Blackman
Barrett cites several cases in which federal law pre-empts state family laws. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:17 pm by Angie Gou
The event took the form of an interview in which Barrett (the professor, not the justice) posed questions to Murray about the state of the court. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States, Sarah Friedman on  Hansberry v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:00 am by Scott Bomboy
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined Alito’s opinion. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am by Marcia Coyle
For now, however, the nation needs to focus on Barrett. [read post]