Search for: "Barry v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 3:00 am
–Barry A. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Wolff; Donald V. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm
In their brief, the Defendants cite the following quote from the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit case of Archbold-Garrett v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am
So will amicus briefs, including one from me and other federal courts scholars (Erwin Chemerinsky, Barry Friedman, Leah Litman, and Fred Smith). [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:13 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 3:27 pm
According to the court, Brennan's claim in the case rested on an alleged “statutorily imposed duty;” however, the former employee cited only federal and state laws prohibiting false statements to government officials. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 3:01 pm
" [AP; State Farm v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:35 am
In King v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:59 pm
To state the obvious, such legislation would be contrary not only to Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
A Perth judge has dismissed accountant Barry McEloney’s claim for $120,000 in damages. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 1:25 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
ACSblog discusses the split among state courts about how to interpret the Court’s ruling last Term in Caperton v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
Barry, 485 U. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:42 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
