Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 701 - 720
of 9,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
Ct. 2567, and branded non-liability in Mensing v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 12:07 am
This situation is not dissimilar to the events in Winnebago Industries, Inc. v Knott Investments Pty Ltd. [read post]
18 May 2017, 12:07 am
This situation is not dissimilar to the events in Winnebago Industries, Inc. v Knott Investments Pty Ltd. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:24 am
When considering the global appreciation of the marks from the perspective of the average consumer, including its similarities and its differences, it was highlighted that it was also necessary to take into account the context of use to the extent permitted by the law (as set out in Specsavers v Asda). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
All of this hubbub surrounds the Supreme Court decision in the PLIVA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:06 pm
The amendment demonstrated that the General Assembly knew how to protect a wholesaler’s right to the continued distribution of a brand, yet previously chose not to do so.The unpublished decision is Country Vintner v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 11:16 am
Miles Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:08 am
In the lawsuit Megnaway Enterprise Sdn Bhd v Soon Lian Hock, plaintiff manufactures and markets security systems for cars with brand THEF-PRO, it has developed and has drawings of all elements in the system. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:54 am
From Brad Aronstam of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz: Last week, Vice Chancellor Noble of the Delaware Court of Chancery rendered this short opinion - in Henkel Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:20 pm
The UK Government/Intellectual Property Office: Ambush marketing generally occurs when one brand pays to sponsor a large-scale event (usually a sporting event) and a rival brand attempts to associate itself with the event. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:20 am
The UK Government/Intellectual Property Office: Ambush marketing generally occurs when one brand pays to sponsor a large-scale event (usually a sporting event) and a rival brand attempts to associate itself with the event. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:19 pm
[Matt Miller, Harrisburg Patriot-News] Tags: eat drink and be merry, trade dress Related posts Yes, tea is hot, too: Zeynep Inanli v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:26 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:29 am
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:08 pm
The Court’s order sending the case of SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 9:51 pm
From the IPKat's much valued friend and scholar Dirk Visser (Klos Morel Vos & Schaap; Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Leiden University) comes news of last week's decision of the Hoge Raad -- the Dutch Supreme Court -- in Case LJN BJ6999, Lego Nederland B.V. c.s v Mega Brands Inc c.s. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:13 am
Said Amanda Pogany, whose 1996 Honda Accord was stolen and, 3 years later, returned "with a brand-new V-8 engine, tinted windows, oversized tires with special hubcaps - and custom valve stem caps shaped like bullet casings... manual transmission... leather interior... and a Dominican flag and a giant wooden cross [hanging] from the rearview mirror. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
In United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
In United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
In United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
