Search for: "C. v. A."
Results 701 - 720
of 62,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2007, 2:14 am
Rampion and another v Franfinance SA and another (Case C-429/05) “A consumer's right under certain conditions, under art 11(2) of Directive 87/102 on consumer credit, to pursue remedies against the provider of finance to him under a credit agreement, applied to a credit facility allowing credit on a number of occasions as well as credit for a single transaction, and the right could not be made conditional on the prior offer of credit naming the goods or services… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:11 pm
I wish this ruling gave us better insight into the Second Circuit's attitudes towards 512(c) post-Viacom v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am
United States, Royer v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:00 pm
SACKETT v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:29 pm
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision ordered mandatory indemnification based on success in underlying litigation pursuant to DGCL § 145(c), in the matter styled: Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 1:57 pm
In Case C-455/06 Heemskerk BV, Firma Schaap v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 8:40 am
Visita nuestro Observatorio COVID-19 en Puerto Rico Se acerca la hora cero para que la gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced firme o vete el Proyecto de la Cámara 1654, mejor conocido como el proyecto del nuevo Código Civil. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 10 February 2014 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:37 pm
On June 17, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Dillon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
Supreme Court decides Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:17 am
On June 19, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Peugh v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:17 am
On June 19, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Peugh v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 8:52 pm
William C. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:12 am
Konsumentombudsmannen v Ving Sverige AB (Case C-122/10); [2011] WLR (D) 181 “A commercial communication constituted an ‘invitation to purchase’ within the meaning of article 2(i) of Parliament and Council Directive 2005/29/EC concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market, as soon as the information on the product and its price were sufficient for the consumer to be able to make a transactional decision. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:39 am
Katharine Traylor Schaffzin (University of Memphis - Cecil C. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm
See Judulang v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:01 am
Contents include:AbhandlungenKai Cornelius, Der Umweltschutz im Völkerstrafrecht Sarah Leyli Rödiger, Staatsverbrechen als kollektives Konzept im Völkerrecht Benedikt C. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 2:11 pm
By Eric Goldman KinderStart.com LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:57 am
GML §207-c benefits to be discontinued if individual receiving such benefits is offered and refuses to accept a light duty assignment for which he or she is qualified Howell v County of Albany, 2013 NY Slip Op 02308, Appellate Division, Third Department A petition submitted to Supreme Court a review of a determination by the Albany County Sheriff to suspend a correction officer’s General Municipal Law §207-c benefits was transferred to the Appellate… [read post]
