Search for: "CARRIER CORP" Results 701 - 720 of 1,346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 6:36 pm by John Day
Sundstrand Corp., 115 F. 3d  493, 496 (CA7 1997) (Easterbrook, J.) [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:44 am by David DePaolo
“Because it is a long tail line, insurance companies have to set more capital aside to support those liabilities," Mark Wilhelm, CEO of Safety National Casualty Corp. told WorkCompCentral's David Dankwa. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by David DePaolo
The Shelby County Health Care Corp., which owned the facility where Vuncannon received treatment for his injuries, filed a complaint in intervention. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:44 am by David J. DePaolo
In 2007, Physician Partner, a pharmaceutical repackager located in Thousand Oaks, Calif. whose parent company is Rebel Distributors Corp. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by Shaun Marker
In the forthcoming weeks, I will write about the other cases consolidated in this decision. 1Igbara Realty Corp. et. al v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:29 am
Another big player in Medicare Advantage, Universal American Corp. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:51 am by David J. DePaolo
Carrier interests and employer interests are not necessarily aligned in workers' compensation cases.The carrier's interest generally is to close the claim as quickly as possible to free up reserve money. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:45 am
That’s one of the questions considered in a new Ontario labour arbitration award involving Canada Post Corp. and a 44-year-old mobile letter carrier.Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm by Ben Cheng
§ 14501(c)(1), which provides that “a State [or] political subdivision . . . may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier . . . with respect to the transportation of property,” contains an unexpressed “market participant” exception and permits a municipal governmental entity to take action that conflicts with the express preemption clause, occurs in a… [read post]