Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 12,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm
United States); whether it violates the “privileges or immunities” of a businessman who wants to operate a ferry service to be denied a permit to compete with an existing service on a public lake in Washington State (Courtney v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:16 am
See prior post on states suing themselves.Today's decision in Sossamon v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
That’s the question before the Indiana Supreme Court in Escamilla v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
That’s the question before the Indiana Supreme Court in Escamilla v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:08 pm
CAAFLog is reporting that CAAF has granted the following issue in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v David James and Ors [2013] UKSC 67. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:10 am
Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v David James and Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 65. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v David James and Ors [2013] UKSC 67. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:50 am
Florida, like a host of other states, has given the option to drunk driving victims in certain cases to pursue civil litigation against individuals or establishments that illegally served alcohol to the driver who caused their injuries. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 7:43 am
I wrote, last December, after reading the oral argument in Evenwel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
In plain language, the utilities do not get a second chance if the State rejects a line based upon the merits. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:34 pm
The main opinion in this case references Troxel v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
[The walls are closing on universal, non-party injunctions against state laws. ] Labrador v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
The Court also concluded that a state "cease and desist" letter likewise did not justify the enhancement because it did not offer the defendant the chance to participate in the process in any meaningful way. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:32 am
United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Agency v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:29 am
Richard v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
The Virginia case has special symbolic significance, because that is the state that produced the case of Loving v. [read post]