Search for: "COOPER V. STATE" Results 701 - 720 of 7,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2018, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Cooper v Klencner  2018 NY Slip Op 30664(U)  April 13, 2018  Surrogate’s Court, New York County Docket Number: 2014-2912/C  Judge: Rita M. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am by Kathy Darvil
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA) and the State of Cuba-EU Economic Relations Larry Catá Backer (Pennsylvania State University) Rafael Velázquez Pérez (Universidade de Vigo y de Holguín)                     1. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal case of Perera v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:06 am by Zoe Bedell
The European Court of Human Rights released its opinion in the case of Trabelsi v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 2:03 pm by John Day
  Foundation’s answer stated that Cooperative, a related company, was actually who provided care to Plaintiff’s brother. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
In the `Statement of Residence,’ she agreed to cooperate with parole supervision staff. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am by Jack Kennedy
The Home Secretary nonetheless concluded that personal service could be effected and that this was an appropriate exercise of her discretion under the Crime (International Cooperation) Act 2003, s.1(3) . [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Seibel v Scarola Zubatov Schaffin PLLC 2025 NY Slip Op 00067 Decided on January 07, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department is the story of how a law firm successfully withdrew from a case when the client became less than cooperative. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 10:57 am by sally
A requested court was not entitled pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of the member states in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 174, p 1), to make the examination of a witness conditional on prior payment of an advance from the requesting court covering his witness expense and there was no obligation upon the requesting court to pay such an advance nor was the requesting court obliged to reimburse the… [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But all winnings streaks have to end sometime, and in the Second Circuit it ends with this case.The case is Cooper v. [read post]