Search for: "California v. Scott"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
This is the first part of today's little trilogy of FRAND-related posts.In early May, the Antitrust Division of the DOJ, under Qualcomm's former outside counsel and now-Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, filed an amicus brief with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California more than three months after the FTC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
In Gonzaga University v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:23 pm
Wood storks v. developers. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:11 am
Quon; USA Mobility Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
Weems v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
Last month, my Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students Jenna Mersereau, Jennifer Milazzo, and Jordan Wolf and I filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Prof. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Last week in the Courts On 26 October 2015, Warby J heard the appeals in the cases of Richardson v Facebook and Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Then there are the failed efforts to get out of state court in California. . . [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
Liza Carens and Scott Cohen preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:47 pm
Scott et al., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Scott Anderson, Charlotte Butash, Susan Hennessey, Quinta Jurecic, Margaret Talor and Benjamin Wittes discussed the Supreme Court decisions on Trump v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:18 am
In a majority opinion in Evenwel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
When a courageous California lawyer, Scott Drexel, was appointed as Chief Disciplinary Counsel to the California State Bar, he tried to change the system. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:54 am
The City's accident reconstructionist, Scott Black, also testified. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Whren v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 5:37 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In Christopher Scott Barker v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 1967; People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
Scott Oswald predicts that “[t]he real-world impact of Somers is likely to be immediate and somewhat perverse. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At Allen Matkins, Keith Bishop notes that the decision “almost certainly invalidates California’s ban [on immoral and scandalous marks] as well. [read post]
