Search for: "Close v. U. S" Results 701 - 720 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
This year's crop includes rulings on substantive and procedural issues involving dissolution, buy-out, appraisal and fiduciary breach involving closely held corporations, limited liability companies, and professional corporations. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Case Background The Supreme Court is poised to resolve this circuit split in Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
Since the government asked the Circuit Court to act on its request “by the close of business tomorrow, July 15,” the Log Cabin Republicans are likely to submit a quick response. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:10 am
Appellant did not present any witnesses in defense.At the close of the evidence, the trial court found appellant guilty of all four charges. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
In addition, the amendments imposed new disclosure requirements regarding an issuer’s insider trading policies and procedures and the adoption, modification, and termination of Rule 10b5-1 plans and similar trading arrangements by directors and officers, as well as new disclosure requirements for executive compensation for certain equity awards made close in time to the issuer’s disclosure of MNPI. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
In addition, the amendments imposed new disclosure requirements regarding an issuer’s insider trading policies and procedures and the adoption, modification, and termination of Rule 10b5-1 plans and similar trading arrangements by directors and officers, as well as new disclosure requirements for executive compensation for certain equity awards made close in time to the issuer’s disclosure of MNPI. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:31 am by Peter J. Sluka
  In BCL 1104-a cases, the Court does have the power to compel a buyout, even between 50/50 shareholders (see Zulkofske v Zulkofske, 2012 NY Slip Op 51210(U) [Suffolk Co. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In this article, we take a close look at the basics of New York’s law of indemnification and advancement. [read post]