Search for: "Close v. U. S"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2012, 11:39 am
Fairchild v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm
Since the government asked the Circuit Court to act on its request “by the close of business tomorrow, July 15,” the Log Cabin Republicans are likely to submit a quick response. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:18 am
Cohen v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:17 am
Alford, 543 U. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Ramos’s methodology was not reliable under Rule 702 and Daubert v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:18 am
Cohen v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
In BCL 1104-a cases, the Court does have the power to compel a buyout, even between 50/50 shareholders (see Zulkofske v Zulkofske, 2012 NY Slip Op 51210(U) [Suffolk Co. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
In this article, we take a close look at the basics of New York’s law of indemnification and advancement. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:34 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:10 am
Appellant did not present any witnesses in defense.At the close of the evidence, the trial court found appellant guilty of all four charges. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:44 am
She made an illegal U-turn to enter SR-126 in Plascencia’s path. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
In addition, the amendments imposed new disclosure requirements regarding an issuer’s insider trading policies and procedures and the adoption, modification, and termination of Rule 10b5-1 plans and similar trading arrangements by directors and officers, as well as new disclosure requirements for executive compensation for certain equity awards made close in time to the issuer’s disclosure of MNPI. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
In addition, the amendments imposed new disclosure requirements regarding an issuer’s insider trading policies and procedures and the adoption, modification, and termination of Rule 10b5-1 plans and similar trading arrangements by directors and officers, as well as new disclosure requirements for executive compensation for certain equity awards made close in time to the issuer’s disclosure of MNPI. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
U. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:29 am
” Bailey v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
Morales, 527 U. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
That’s what happened in Culbertson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
I’ve pretty much just described the circumstances present in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], a post-trial decision handed down earlier this month by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
