Search for: "Commonwealth v. Major"
Results 701 - 720
of 951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
In the recent case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 7:54 pm
Recently this very issue has come before the Supreme Judical Court in Massachusetts in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
I also noted that before the First Amendment was ratified, a majority of the 13 original US states had passed copyright laws after providing for the freedom of the press, lending strength to the argument that the Framers conceived the two as wholly consistent. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
This same battle was already fought, and lost, back in the 1980s with Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:45 pm
(for a deeper discussion of exactly what that means read Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:45 pm
(for a deeper discussion of exactly what that means read Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Crawford, 306 N.W.2d 614, 623 (N.D. 1981) (dictum); Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Crawford, 306 N.W.2d 614, 623 (N.D. 1981) (dictum); Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
The term owner, when used in connection with an Internet site, includes any owner of a majority interest in the Internet site. (12) TRADEMARK. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm
Bank v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:51 am
Justice McCaffery's Majority Opinion may be viewed here. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
On April 8, in the case of Bingham v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
There have also been some major substantive changes in Pennsylvania civil litigation law. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Some opponents of the effort to recall Governor Scott Walker have claimed that the recall provisions of the Wisconsin State Constitution are intended solely to permit the recall of elected officials when they have engaged in criminal or grossly unethical conduct. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:53 pm
When determining whether an institution is an agency or instrumentality of the government, we must consider whether the Commonwealth has majority control of the board. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:49 am
"In the later 1980 opinion, the Attorney General concluded that the Lieutenant Governor could not provide the tie-breaking vote on matters subject to this provision of Article IV, section 11: "No bill which creates or establishes a new office, or which creates, continues, or revives a debt or charge, or which makes, continues, or revives any appropriation of public or trust money or property, or which releases, discharges, or commutes any claim or demand of the Commonwealth, or… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Accordingly, I must depart from the reasoning of the majority. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:19 pm
SUPREME COURT Gideon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm
Utah 1995) (finding Utah’s criminal prohibition on adultery was valid based on adultery’s social costs); Commonwealth v. [read post]
