Search for: "Coney v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Justices argue over text (and ceviche) in ruling that Alaska Native corporations are “Indian tribes”
27 Jun 2021, 6:41 pm
The case, Yellen v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Media have focused attention on two potential nominees, Amy Coney Barrett, currently a judge on the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:27 pm
Thursday’s ruling in Haaland v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Free Speech Coalition)Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:14 am
And of course, all three Trump-appointed justices joined the Court’s other conservatives to overturn Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:55 am
After the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, however, the state’s attorneys changed course and explicitly asked the Court to uphold Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban by overturning Roe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:55 am
” On this point, the majority opinion repeatedly referred to Zauderer v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Alito’s confirmation in 2006 kicked off a shift to the right that accelerated with the arrival of three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – nominated by former President Donald Trump. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm
And with the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Sept. 18, there were only eight justices participating in the oral argument in Carney v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:17 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm
In Ohio v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:15 am
On June 8, 2023, the court, in a 7-2 decision, ruled in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
This issue came up in a little reported exchange in the oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina between Justice Amy Coney Barrett and David Hinojosa is the director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: JUSTICE BARRETT: One question. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
” That characterization ignored the ruling’s profound real-world effect, preventing 85%-90% of women from exercising their rights under Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm
” Sotomayor pointed to the confusion lower courts have had applying the similar analysis Thomas offered in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:08 am
” Before diving into the court’s opinion in George v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am
Biskupic's story also confirms what many have long suspected about the Supreme Court's decision in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
