Search for: "Cooper v. U.s.*" Results 701 - 720 of 1,224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Part III then turns to a close study of the cooperative and its constraints, starting with a consideration of the agricultural cooperative as template for changes. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:26 pm
As a mutual insurance company, the defendant was “owned cooperatively by its policyholders,” LaPlant, slip op. at 1, and paid dividends to policyholders out of its profits. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
Cooper, 12-7516, had to settle for even less; his petition was denied with nary a dissent, only a statement accompanying denial from Justice Breyer (joined by Justice Sotomayor). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Cooper, 12-7516 (the Fifth Circuit state-on-bottom habeas case, now up for its fifth relist); and Harris v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Ray Dowd
Copyright Infringement, Declaratory Judgment, Exclusive Copyright License, Evidence, Statute of Frauds, Implied Nonexclusive Copyright License, Jury Instructions, Verdict Forms, Attorneys FeesBaisden v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Cooper, 12-7516, out of the Fifth Circuit, which has graced these pages before, first as a relist and then as a hold. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Cooper, 12-7516, in which it already had briefs in opposition, perhaps until Hammond catches up. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Cooper, 12-7516, out of the Fifth, raise nearly identical Cullen and Martinez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:16 pm by WIMS
The court's ultimate allocation of liability reasonably weighs relevant factors, including the degree of involvement each party had in disposals (both primary and secondary) on the site, the degree of care each party exhibited with respect to hazardous substances, the degree to which each party cooperated with government officials with respect to hazardous substances, and the benefit each party reaped from disposals of hazardous substances on the site. [read post]