Search for: "Couch v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
  I also have a case where a client has been the victim of what is likely to be a state sponsored online reputational attack. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
Through these cases the High Court elected not to follow the English approach (see Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd) which requires that another forum is clearly or distinctly more appropriate. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
Trust as reliance and faith in character, and the expectations that this produced, were deeply embedded in the law of corporations as it developed in the United States (one notes, however, a generalized convergence of notions of director duties in European and Chinese systems; e.g., Gerner-Beuerle & Schuster, 2014, 199 (Europe); Xu et al. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm by Cary Coglianese
Last year, President Trump responded angrily to the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 7:16 am by Blake E. Reid
But the only case Goldin relies on is a 1942 appellate case, People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Court’s grant of the writ of certiorari in the case of Leidos, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 1:40 pm by John Floyd
United States:   “The door of a court is not barred because the plaintiff has committed a crime. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, American Risk Insurance Company, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:42 am by Jeff Redding
By way of an answer to these questions, and to return to the theme of my earlier posts in this series on legal education—as well as my research on non-state Muslim courts in India—I give you the image right here. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Kevin
When it was filed on April 20, the opinion in People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by SHG
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]