Search for: "Creative Marketing v. AT&T"
Results 701 - 720
of 987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
(1709 Blog) Portugal Is Portugal about to make Creative Commons illegal? [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:14 am
Choudhry (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court N D California: Copyright takedown notice isn’t actionable unless there’s an actual takedown: Amaretto v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
He ended the opinion by saying, “We trust that AT&T will not take it personally. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:45 am
Curiously, the company also seems to have mostly eliminated references to the “creative markets” its has historically dominated — perhaps most notably, Hollywood — dropping it from a list that includes “consumers, small and mid-sized businesses, education, enterprise and government customers. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
Highlights this week included: Supreme Court hears oral argument in Microsoft v i4i (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Patents Post-Grant) (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) (Ars Technica) (Patent Law Practice Center) (Inventive Step) AG advises ECJ: ISPs can’t be ordered to block file-sharing: C-70/10 Scarlet Extended SA v Sabam, BEA Video, BEA Music, ISPA (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) CAFC (en banc): New rules for post injunction contempt… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:24 am
Groupon, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm
[T]he copyrightability of a very short textual work — be it word, phrase, sentence, or stanza — depends on the presence of creativity. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
The current WIPO process (which is actually quite tame and is more directed at clarifying frameworks for resolving disputes than in actually directing how they should be resolved) has attracted the ire of Boingboing's Cory Doctorow here, which makes salutary reading for anyone who believes that a huge gulf does not exist between those who see the value of IP as a basis for protecting investment and creativity and those who don't (thank you, Mike Lynd, Mars &… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:00 pm
Obzilla (KSR) doesn't much care whether prior art is analogous, because "a court can take account of the inferences and creative steps that a person of ordinary skill in the art would employ. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:58 pm
CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Sorrel v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
Q&A Jacqueline Charlesworth: many content owners don’t have the resources to prepare and send takedown notices. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
”(Cadbury in Chinese) for fertilizers (China Law Insight) The lizard’s weekly China news roundup – Silk Market fight against fakes, Intangible Cultural Heritage draft law review (IP Dragon) China Daily defends Beijing’s Silk Market (China Hearsay) Jissbon’s trademark license head fake (China Hearsay) Europe OHIM Board of Appeal and the rules of chivalry: R 1262/2010-1 (Class 46) It doesn’t pay to toy around with Autec: OHIM… [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:13 pm
A protocol might make sense although its existence doesn’t point one way or the other at this stage. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:52 am
G&L Holding Group, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
Procter & Gamble Mfg. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:55 am
So at the highest level IP v innovation can be boiled down quite neatly. [read post]
