Search for: "Creek v State" Results 701 - 720 of 936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 1:26 pm by Matthew Nelson
”  Justice Young noted that the case was moot because “Merit no longer has the physical means of discharging treated water into Kolke Creek” (emphasis in original) because Merit had quitclaimed its easement across state land. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm by brian
     The $3.4 billion settlement in Cobell v. [read post]