Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 16,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
“Interlinking arrangements among fast payment systems (FPS) are one of the most promising solutions for enhancing cross-border payments, offering the prospect of significantly faster, cheaper, more accessible and transparent cross-border payments,” the report said. . . . [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am
“The use of lethal drone strikes outside of recognized theaters of conflict is presumptively illegal and violates several covenant rights… [including] the right to life as the supreme right from which no derogation is permitted,” noted Canadian member Marcia V. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:32 pm
” Sarkissian v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:09 am
The case is Khan v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:19 pm
See Egan v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:49 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Davidoff & Ors v (i) Dhir Doshi and (ii) Thomas Govan [Claim No. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
The parties filed cross-appeals. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
An undocumented individual who crossed the border decades ago, or someone who had just crossed fleeing persecution in Mexico, would be at risk of summary expulsion by a state or local law enforcement officer. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
Through these cases the High Court elected not to follow the English approach (see Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd) which requires that another forum is clearly or distinctly more appropriate. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
Plaintiff then filed her claims in state court under the State and City Human Rights Laws. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
” Aaradhya Bachchan v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
To determine if procedures interfering with fundamental rights comply with Fourteenth Amendment due process rights, the court applies the Mathews v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
From today's order and accompanying opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am
An employer or any other person or entity that violates this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor… Before you ask, sure, that would seem to mean that if an employee (and applicant for employment as well as stated in a footnote in Gay Law Students Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
