Search for: "DAVID S. KENNEDY" Results 701 - 720 of 2,669
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The workshops also featured Benedict Dellaert of the Netherlands’ Erasmus University Rotterdam, Sorelle Friedler of Haverford College, Stephen Goldsmith of the Harvard Kennedy School, John Mikhail and David Robinson of Georgetown Law, Helen Nissenbaum of Cornell University, and Andrew Selbst of the Yale Information Society Project. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:22 am by David Gans
   Justice Kennedys record in past gerrymandering cases is mixed, but he has previously recognized that the First Amendment may be a specific limit on partisan gerrymandering by the states. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
The news channel KCRA3 posted video of Kennedys speech online. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:25 pm by Jim Sedor
Kennedy | Published: 9/26/2017 In an era in which states are barring politicians from lobbying their former colleagues until after a waiting period, an investigation found three current elected officials in Illinois working as lobbyists. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Here’s the suggested language: WARNING: This raw (unpasteurized) milk (cream) may contain disease-causing organisms. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reuters, David Beasley reports that “Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch opposed the stay. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
Four other justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer – disagreed; they would have allowed courts to review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
” As Justice Kennedy explained, “the petitioners in these cases seek to find that liberty by marrying someone of the same sex and having their marriages deemed lawful on the same terms and conditions as marriages between persons of the opposite sex” (emphasis added). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage highlights “the major questions before the court this fall. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:14 am by Derek T. Muller
Mahoney (Yale 2006 / Kozinski), partner at Williams & Connolly Justice David H. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
It’s bad enough that Justice Kennedy made the mistake in the first place. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:28 am by Vanita Gupta
” On that principle, there ought to be no question that Colorado’s law allowing Charlie Craig and David Mullins to buy a wedding cake from any bakery they choose – notwithstanding that they are gay – should trump claims by a bakery that providing the cake would violate the owner’s religious beliefs. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:47 am by Edith Roberts
Massachusetts, in which the court held that defendants have a constitutional right to cross-examine the chemists who tested drug samples used as evidence in the defendants’ trials, concluding that “time has borne out some of both Scalia’s and Kennedys predictions and revealed that others were unfounded. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
Show Notes Today’s show was edited by David Stotz. [read post]