Search for: "DEFENDANT DOE 1-10"
Results 701 - 720
of 12,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2020, 3:59 am
Accordingly, there is no documentary evidence here sufficient to require dismissal of the legal malpractice claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) (see IMO Indus. v Anderson Kill & Olick, 267 AD2d 10 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:48 am
The plaintiff alleges that the defendant’s tractor-trailer rear-ended him while driving in the same direction on Interstate Highway 10 in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:26 pm
" NCAC Section 6-30(a)(1). [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
(Clarence) Hunter was the duly authorized agent of the defendant on and after April 22, 1954. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 1:31 pm
Id.at *10. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
It also addresses an interesting Apprendi claim.1. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:16 am
Id. at 9-10. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:12 pm
In reality, an interim injunction is only likely to be granted if the defendant is anonymous or does not engage with the process. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:20 am
Intel Corporation, 1-10-cv-01077 (NMD May 31, 2011, Order) (Schneider, M.J.) [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:38 am
(Eugene Volokh) I regret to say that the Court has denied my petition for certiorari challenging Oregon’s practice of allowing convictions by 10–2 and 11–1 votes. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
Does 1–10, No. 10–5022, 2011 WL 5444622 (U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Sutter, the court concluded that the arbitrator did not exceed his powers under section 10(a)(4) of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. 1 et seq., either in construing the arbitration clause as he did or in certifying a class. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:49 am
., 2014 WL 4843674, No. 8:10–CV–365 (D. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
R. 10(c)). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:12 am
A person does not lose their liberties simply because he or she is charged with a crime. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 pm
Apr. 10, 2023). [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 12:39 pm
" [DE 1-2 at 10]. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 7:39 am
., Nos. 05-1184, 05-1758 (10/13/06). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 8:31 am
Defendants advertised, for example, a “$10 whale watching special” even though a consumer could never get on a whale watching cruise operated by defendants for only $10 because of a $2.50 fuel surcharge and a 2% wharfage fee on top of the $10. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
Muslims for Palestine, No. 1:17-CV-3591 (N.D. [read post]
